Éric Zemmour on health, housing, education, religion
The findings of polemicist Éric Zemmour, as well as the proposals on the themes of housing, education, health, religion with the prospect of the French presidential election of 2022.
The coronavirus is a serious disease that has killed a lot of people, but compared in history to other epidemics it is a disease that kills few.
With the health pass, it is a quasi compulsory vaccination, we are prevented from living if we are not vaccinated. We are forced to get vaccinated if we want to go to restaurants, cafes, theaters, public places. We are forced. The Kouchner law of 2002 requires the free and informed consent of the patient, so we cannot impose compulsory vaccination in France. There is an Orwéllienne method.
Compulsory vaccination is prohibited by all the conventions that we have signed, we can call into question national conventions, but then we must say it and be honest. Otherwise it sounds sneaky. We can understand contradictory interventions because this situation is not simple, but we cannot change our minds permanently. But of course the collective interest exists.
For medically assisted procreation between two women, what we remember is that the father is useless. It is an ideological logic of sexual indifferentiation, of gender fluidity, and of the disappearance of the father. Surrogacy is likely to happen soon to satisfy gender equality. Equality here serves as a screen. LGBT groups have an ideological agenda which is to destroy the heterosexual norm. For them, it is not enough that there is a citizen equality of individual, it is also necessary a sexual equality, of sexual tastes.
We must be humble about the subject of euthanasia. One day the person will no longer want to live, and the next day he will have the desire to live again. There are the risks of manipulation of euthanasia for relatives who would like to receive an inheritance. Moral laws are there to prevent people from doing the worst. It is an extremely difficult subject, which is not Manichean. However, to say that people have the freedom to kill themselves, we open the door to everything.
Each year, there are 1 million hours devoted to the suppression of drug trafficking. It doesn't work, it costs a fortune, the police put themselves in danger. Our first instinct would be to repress even more, but it is clear that this does not work. Another solution must therefore be found. There are 18 million French people who have already touched cannabis, including 5 million in the last twelve months. 39% of teens have smoked cannabis by the age of 17. We must therefore think about the orderly decriminalization of cannabis so that the police can deal with more serious problems.
Housing for the powers in place over the last 40 years: it is the republican sursault, it is the condition of living together, it is necessary to make society. It is a narrative that is false. France, the French would be responsible for having ghettoized in low-rent housing, in social housing immigrants, this is what means that there is no longer any living together between recent immigration and the French of stock or former European immigration.
Social housing is a construction at the beginning of the last century for workers, and even under Napoleon III. There was never any social mix, there were only popular classes. Then, we extended, there was the rural exodus with all the peasants who came. Then we built in haste in the 50s and 60s with the arrival of black feet. Finally, there was immigration from the Maghreb, Africa, etc ... with finally family reunification. And there, it was altered. Not because of the ghettos, but because there was a rule of assimilation, the French worker was the model on which we called ourselves. In the 1970s, we delegitimized the worker who is no longer a referent. At that time, we praised multiculturalism, the right to be different, living together in low-rent housing was no longer possible. There were different mores, different cultures, different civilizations. Contrary to the proverb which says: who look alike assembles, we could say: who do not look alike separates.
The ghettos appear from the 80s. The native French, the French of European origin flee these dwellings which have become neighborhoods where there is another way of life, ruled by Islam, by African mores, without to count by the violence of thugs who become bosses and major drug traffickers. The narrative which says that we created ghettos and that now we have to break them is fallacious. For this, several policies would like to bring other people to create social mix. It would be modest people who fled these suburbs at the time. These people do not want, for them it is hell. They did everything to escape these neighborhoods. What will happen is the opposite, to achieve their ends, the politicians will put low-rent housing everywhere to have their famous social mix. It is a war that the bourgeois elites wage against the French popular classes to force them to live with people who do not recognize their model. There is also a revenge side, even among the bourgeois there will be these low-rent buildings. We will spread the problems that were concentrated only in these so-called sensitive neighborhoods.
LGBT people should not use activist propaganda in school classrooms. School is made to learn, to read, to write, to count. At school, we must insist on learning French, French literature, French history. The school level has collapsed, the children no longer have the level, and neither do the teachers.
Islam and Islamism are the same thing. When we coined the word Islamism, it was only to create a balance with the word Christianity, Judaism, Protestantism. Islam is a religion of political theology, it is a civilization, it is a nation, it is an umma which is incompatible with the principles of France. Muslims may very well detach themselves from Islam and have a practice of their religion which is "Christian". The critical reading of Islam has always lost. In the 9th century, the mutazilites were wiped out. There are people who have a practice detached from theocratic and political precepts. There is the Koran of Medina, the Koran of Mecca, it is the Koran of Medina which is imposed. We must francize the practice of Islam, as the Jews did under Napoleon. Muslims must be faced with their responsibilities.
The Islamic veil is not France. Islamic veils must be banned in public spaces for little girls. The veil must be prohibited for accompanying mothers, even in public spaces.
There is a problem of secularism in the country because there is no more assimilation. People who came before to the country assimilated the French culture which is steeped in secularism. Because French culture is Christian and secularism has overturned Christianity. The anticlericals have used secularism to turn the teaching of the church against the church in order to put it completely outside the political debate. It is therefore necessary to be assimilated to be secular. Islamic culture is not secular because Islam does not know secularism. For Islam, secularism is unbelief. And so it is forbidden. Either we assimilate into French culture and secularism and naturalness, or we refuse to assimilate into French culture and secularism is entirely rejected.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.