HOME > SOCIETY > POPULATION
Éric Zemmour on immigration
The proposals of the polemicist Éric Zemmour on the theme of immigration, with the entries and exits on the territory, the right of asylum, the family reunification, the right of the soil, the social assistance, during the debates for the election French presidential election of 2022.
Immigration :
Totalitarianism is no longer communist but it is today globalized, or even Islamic. There are 400,000 foreigners who legally come to France every year. Over the last five years, two million foreigners have returned to the country. We must renounce the Evian agreements and denounce them because this has increased the possibilities of immigration to France.
The French elites made a mistake by bringing in millions of immigrants from an Arab-Muslim civilization, hostile to the Christian civilization from which we have come for 1000 years. Civilization is not a religion, as André Malraux says: civilization is joined to a religion. The rights to regulate France's immigration policy were gradually given to immigrants. We have accumulated rights for them and they are the ones who choose who comes and who does not come, whether it is the son, the daughter, the mother, the father, the cousin, the wife, etc ...
In 2019, there were 275,000 legal entries, which breaks down into family reunification, family immigration, students. 14% of these people come to work. Then 170,000 people come for the right of asylum. They are 80% unsuccessful, but only 10% leave. There are also unaccompanied minors, who are neither minors nor isolated for the most part, they are 20,000 per year. That is 400,000 legal immigrants per year. We do not know the number of illegal immigrants, who are estimated between 400,000 and 800,000. If we consider only legal immigrants, it is as many people as the inhabitants of the city of Nice. That makes 2 million legal immigrants over the last five years, or as many as the population of Paris.
Regarding the outings, these are the outings of French expatriates and not immigrants.
France has not always been a country of immigration. Between the 9th century, until the 19th century, France had a very stable population. From 1860 under Napoleon 3 and because of colonization, the country begins to have immigrants. They are Belgian, Italian, Spanish, so they are Christians and have no cultural distance. They are much less numerous today. Pierre Milza said that there were 3 million Italians who had come in 1870 and 1940 and only one million remained. Because at the time, delinquents, the unemployed were dismissed, there was no automatic family reunification. Only assimilated people were kept in this way. Today, we have 3 million North Africans in less than ten years.
France is a compound of people, with the Gallo-Romans, the Ligurians, the Iberians, the Celts, the Ostrogoths, the Franks, etc ... As Jacques Bainville says, France is neither an empire, nor a race, she is better, she is a nation. The first cement of these diverse peoples was Catholicism. Catholicism on the one hand with the conversion of King Clovis. General De Gaulle said: the history of my country begins with the conversion of Clovis. And the king's sword.
The concept of creolization put forward by Édouard Glissant is called assimilation. Assimilation, as historian Fernand Braudel said, is what allowed painless integration. Assimilation means making French history, French culture and French mores our own. It means becoming French, dressing like the French, giving your children a French name. Creolizing we do not know what that means in fact, it is a pseudo-poetic chimera to extol globalization and its great merits. Édouard Glissant is actually an Alain Minc from Martinique. It is multiculturalism, the right to be different.
Islam is a political religion in essence, poles apart from what France, the republic and secularism are. Islam is not concerned with the interiority of the faithful, but with social and political norms. Islam is a religion which competes with the civil code. The French motto is liberty, equality, fraternity. Islam means submission. It is a triple inequality, between men and women, between free men and slaves, between the faithful and the infidels. It is the brotherhood in the Umma, that is to say the community of believers of the Islamic nation. So there is a block to block difference.
As the Kabyle poet, Ferhat Mehenni says, Islam is Islamism at rest and Islamism is Islam in action. We can make a difference between Muslims and Islam. Muslims who can appropriate the French conception of religion, considering that their religion is only private. They have their place in France, they are French citizens like you and me. Exactly the same thing France has imposed on the Jews must be imposed on the Islamic religion. According to the famous formula of Stanislas de Clermont-Tonnerre: everything to the Jews as individuals, nothing as a nation.
Mu'tazilite Islam which wanted to introduce rationality into the understanding of the religious phenomenon was cut down in the 9th century. France is not racist when it defends its model, its culture, its civilization. We must fight against the change of civilization, of people. We need zero immigration. If we don't intervene, in 2050 we will be a half-Islamic country. In 2100, we will be an Islamic republic. In France, there will be a kind of greater Lebanon where there will be areas that are no longer France, as is already the case. A European directive says that integration is a reciprocal phenomenon of contribution from the host country and the newcomer. Whereas in reality assimilation is the real means of integration. We are not going to force people to change their first names. But people should be forced to give their children French first names as the Italians did.
in 2019, there were 275,000 legal entries, with family reunification, students, work (14%), humanitarian law. In addition, there are 130,000 asylum applications, of which approximately 36,000 are accepted, 90,000 are rejected, only 10 to 15% of those rejected are returned. There are between 40 and 50,000 unaccompanied minors in France, that makes between 350 and 400,000 people, the equivalent of the city of Nice, mostly Maghreb and Africans who arrive each year in France, including a huge majority of Muslims. However, we have an enormous cultural distance from Islam. Over the last five years, France will have had 2 million more foreigners, coming from most of the Maghreb and sub-Saharan Africa.
We must stop this madness, and ensure that in the next 5 years we reduce by 2 million the number of foreigners in the country. we could consider the departure or non-arrival of many migrants. this trend must be reversed. There has been a phenomenon for 30 or 40 years of defrancization, General De Gaule used the expression of francization at the time of the Algerian war. We teach the French more about the love of France, its history, its culture, its greatness and we let immigrants live as in the country, we have given up on assimilating them. The first name is an identity marker, giving your child a French first name is proof of love for France, a way of honoring France. Muslim immigrants do not give their children a French first name, because they are Christian names, they don't want to, they want to persevere in their Islamic being. From 1903 until 1993, the law required parents of children born in France to give them a French first name, it was the rule.
We need a moratorium on immigration. We must remove the circular Valls which allows to regularize over the water, discreetly thousands and thousands of illegal. Successive governments use this circular to regularize 30,000 illegal immigrants per year. We can impose a fee on all foreigners who apply for a visa in France with the obligation to pay a deposit of 10,000 euros, other countries do so as in the United States. Thus, if they do not leave, they would pay for their repatriation themselves, which is costing us dearly. We can charge companies that hire illegal workers.
We need the elimination of land rights to counter the migratory invasion. In order to avoid the annulment of this type of measure by the constitutional judge, it is necessary to go through a referendum.
We must stop family reunification which transforms immigration from the Maghreb and Africa into settlement immigration.
We must remove the national solidarity measures, that is to say the social, to foreigners and give it only to the French.
Immigration :
Totalitarianism is no longer communist but it is today globalized, or even Islamic. There are 400,000 foreigners who legally come to France every year. Over the last five years, two million foreigners have returned to the country. We must renounce the Evian agreements and denounce them because this has increased the possibilities of immigration to France.
The French elites made a mistake by bringing in millions of immigrants from an Arab-Muslim civilization, hostile to the Christian civilization from which we have come for 1000 years. Civilization is not a religion, as André Malraux says: civilization is joined to a religion. The rights to regulate France's immigration policy were gradually given to immigrants. We have accumulated rights for them and they are the ones who choose who comes and who does not come, whether it is the son, the daughter, the mother, the father, the cousin, the wife, etc ...
In 2019, there were 275,000 legal entries, which breaks down into family reunification, family immigration, students. 14% of these people come to work. Then 170,000 people come for the right of asylum. They are 80% unsuccessful, but only 10% leave. There are also unaccompanied minors, who are neither minors nor isolated for the most part, they are 20,000 per year. That is 400,000 legal immigrants per year. We do not know the number of illegal immigrants, who are estimated between 400,000 and 800,000. If we consider only legal immigrants, it is as many people as the inhabitants of the city of Nice. That makes 2 million legal immigrants over the last five years, or as many as the population of Paris.
Regarding the outings, these are the outings of French expatriates and not immigrants.
France has not always been a country of immigration. Between the 9th century, until the 19th century, France had a very stable population. From 1860 under Napoleon 3 and because of colonization, the country begins to have immigrants. They are Belgian, Italian, Spanish, so they are Christians and have no cultural distance. They are much less numerous today. Pierre Milza said that there were 3 million Italians who had come in 1870 and 1940 and only one million remained. Because at the time, delinquents, the unemployed were dismissed, there was no automatic family reunification. Only assimilated people were kept in this way. Today, we have 3 million North Africans in less than ten years.
France is a compound of people, with the Gallo-Romans, the Ligurians, the Iberians, the Celts, the Ostrogoths, the Franks, etc ... As Jacques Bainville says, France is neither an empire, nor a race, she is better, she is a nation. The first cement of these diverse peoples was Catholicism. Catholicism on the one hand with the conversion of King Clovis. General De Gaulle said: the history of my country begins with the conversion of Clovis. And the king's sword.
The concept of creolization put forward by Édouard Glissant is called assimilation. Assimilation, as historian Fernand Braudel said, is what allowed painless integration. Assimilation means making French history, French culture and French mores our own. It means becoming French, dressing like the French, giving your children a French name. Creolizing we do not know what that means in fact, it is a pseudo-poetic chimera to extol globalization and its great merits. Édouard Glissant is actually an Alain Minc from Martinique. It is multiculturalism, the right to be different.
Islam is a political religion in essence, poles apart from what France, the republic and secularism are. Islam is not concerned with the interiority of the faithful, but with social and political norms. Islam is a religion which competes with the civil code. The French motto is liberty, equality, fraternity. Islam means submission. It is a triple inequality, between men and women, between free men and slaves, between the faithful and the infidels. It is the brotherhood in the Umma, that is to say the community of believers of the Islamic nation. So there is a block to block difference.
As the Kabyle poet, Ferhat Mehenni says, Islam is Islamism at rest and Islamism is Islam in action. We can make a difference between Muslims and Islam. Muslims who can appropriate the French conception of religion, considering that their religion is only private. They have their place in France, they are French citizens like you and me. Exactly the same thing France has imposed on the Jews must be imposed on the Islamic religion. According to the famous formula of Stanislas de Clermont-Tonnerre: everything to the Jews as individuals, nothing as a nation.
Mu'tazilite Islam which wanted to introduce rationality into the understanding of the religious phenomenon was cut down in the 9th century. France is not racist when it defends its model, its culture, its civilization. We must fight against the change of civilization, of people. We need zero immigration. If we don't intervene, in 2050 we will be a half-Islamic country. In 2100, we will be an Islamic republic. In France, there will be a kind of greater Lebanon where there will be areas that are no longer France, as is already the case. A European directive says that integration is a reciprocal phenomenon of contribution from the host country and the newcomer. Whereas in reality assimilation is the real means of integration. We are not going to force people to change their first names. But people should be forced to give their children French first names as the Italians did.
in 2019, there were 275,000 legal entries, with family reunification, students, work (14%), humanitarian law. In addition, there are 130,000 asylum applications, of which approximately 36,000 are accepted, 90,000 are rejected, only 10 to 15% of those rejected are returned. There are between 40 and 50,000 unaccompanied minors in France, that makes between 350 and 400,000 people, the equivalent of the city of Nice, mostly Maghreb and Africans who arrive each year in France, including a huge majority of Muslims. However, we have an enormous cultural distance from Islam. Over the last five years, France will have had 2 million more foreigners, coming from most of the Maghreb and sub-Saharan Africa.
We must stop this madness, and ensure that in the next 5 years we reduce by 2 million the number of foreigners in the country. we could consider the departure or non-arrival of many migrants. this trend must be reversed. There has been a phenomenon for 30 or 40 years of defrancization, General De Gaule used the expression of francization at the time of the Algerian war. We teach the French more about the love of France, its history, its culture, its greatness and we let immigrants live as in the country, we have given up on assimilating them. The first name is an identity marker, giving your child a French first name is proof of love for France, a way of honoring France. Muslim immigrants do not give their children a French first name, because they are Christian names, they don't want to, they want to persevere in their Islamic being. From 1903 until 1993, the law required parents of children born in France to give them a French first name, it was the rule.
We need a moratorium on immigration. We must remove the circular Valls which allows to regularize over the water, discreetly thousands and thousands of illegal. Successive governments use this circular to regularize 30,000 illegal immigrants per year. We can impose a fee on all foreigners who apply for a visa in France with the obligation to pay a deposit of 10,000 euros, other countries do so as in the United States. Thus, if they do not leave, they would pay for their repatriation themselves, which is costing us dearly. We can charge companies that hire illegal workers.
We need the elimination of land rights to counter the migratory invasion. In order to avoid the annulment of this type of measure by the constitutional judge, it is necessary to go through a referendum.
We must stop family reunification which transforms immigration from the Maghreb and Africa into settlement immigration.
We must remove the national solidarity measures, that is to say the social, to foreigners and give it only to the French.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Related posts:
Éric Piolle on defense, immigration, security
https://w3ask.com/eric-piolle-defense-immigration-security/
https://w3ask.com/eric-piolle-defense-immigration-security/
The proposals of the mayor of Grenoble, Eric Piolle on the subjects of immigration, defense, security, women's rights for the environmentalists ...
Éric Zemmour on energy, ecology, carbon tax
https://w3ask.com/eric-zemmour-energy-ecology-carbon-tax/
https://w3ask.com/eric-zemmour-energy-ecology-carbon-tax/
The observations and proposals of the writer Éric Zemmour on the subjects of ecology, energy, the carbon tax during televised debates with ...
Éric Zemmour on health, housing, education, religion
https://w3ask.com/eric-zemmour-health-housing-education-religion/
https://w3ask.com/eric-zemmour-health-housing-education-religion/
The findings of polemicist Éric Zemmour, as well as the proposals on the themes of housing, education, health, religion with the prospect of ...
Éric Zemmour on the economy
https://w3ask.com/eric-zemmour-economy/
https://w3ask.com/eric-zemmour-economy/
The proposals of the journalist Éric Zemmour on the subjects of the economy, with the gross domestic product, the relocations, the reindustrialisation, ...
Éric Zemmour on work, retirement
https://w3ask.com/eric-zemmour-work-retirement/
https://w3ask.com/eric-zemmour-work-retirement/
The proposals of the journalist and politician Éric Zemmour on the subjects of retirement, work during interviews and political debates with ...